<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tea Party Roundtable &#187; Personal Responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teapartyroundtable.com/category/personal-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com</link>
	<description>Returning To Our Foundations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We Stand Against Romney</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=we-stand-against-romney</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHAT TO DO THIS WEEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney is not a Conservative, in fact it is fair to say that he is Liberal. Tea Party RoundTable urges you to not vote for Romney. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px; ">Mitt Romney is not a Conservative, in fact it is fair to say that he is Liberal.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px; ">Tea Party RoundTable urges you to not vote for Romney.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qyp2QIGejq4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=illegal-immigration</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&#160; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants. Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&nbsp; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug trafficking and human trafficking.&nbsp; If it&#8217;s this easy for thugs to illegally cross the border undetected how much more is it for terrorists who plan for years their strategies?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">We must deal swiftly and resolutely with the border issue for our security and economic survival.&nbsp; However we also need to figure out what to do with those <em><strong>illegal </strong></em>immigrants who have come here just to work and have been here for many years.&nbsp; Many of them have raised families, which adds to the economic burden but must be acknowledged.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The crime of illegally immigrating to the United States must be punished, and it can be done in a humane way using common sense and justice.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s my simple idea:</p>
<p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">1. If you&rsquo;ve been here for less than 10 years with no criminal history you get deported with an option to return legally.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">2. If you have been convicted of any felony you get deported and refused re-entry permanently.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">3. If you&rsquo;ve been here for longer than 10 years with no criminal history you are given temporary transitional visas under the following guidelines:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You must acquire legal residency within 5 years</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You&rsquo;re wages are garnished for back taxes of $4,000 per year, split evenly between the state and federal government (that would be equivalent to what they would have paid in federal taxes if they earned about $27,000 annually)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">Any felony conviction results in immediate deportation with permanently refused re-entry
<p>    </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;m sure this plan is not perfect, but let&rsquo;s bring some sanity to this problem and solve it!</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative &#8220;Bubble&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=conservative-bubble</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sitting in Starbucks next to a couple college girls who were talking about politics.&#160; One girl said that her parents are &#8220;Republican and all that&#8221; and mused that it would be nice to &#8220;marry someone who is liberal to balance it out.&#8221;&#160; She went on to say that she wanted to &#8220;get outside [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I was sitting in Starbucks next to a couple college girls who were talking about politics.&nbsp; One girl said that her parents are &ldquo;Republican and all that&rdquo; and mused that it would be nice to &ldquo;marry someone who is liberal to balance it out.&rdquo;&nbsp; She went on to say that she wanted to &ldquo;get outside that bubble.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">My dear young friend, It&rsquo;s not a &ldquo;bubble&rdquo; it&rsquo;s a value system.&nbsp; If someone is Republican they might be either liberal or conservative.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you are liberal you believe that the federal government has the primary responsibility to protect you and provide for your needs.&nbsp; They believe we are protected by government regulations, and we are provided for by taking money out of your paycheck and giving some of the money you&rsquo;ve earned to other people.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you are conservative you believe that the federal government&rsquo;s responsibilities are outlined and limited to what is in the Constitution and the subsequent Amendments.&nbsp; Specifically:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">Protecting citizens God-given rights (on-going)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> National Defense (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing Federal Courts (done)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Copyright Protection (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing a national set of weights and measures (done)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing Post Office (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Everything else should be taken care of by the individual citizen or the state government.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">The problem with getting outside a &ldquo;bubble&rdquo; is that requires destroying the bubble &hellip; and that bubble can never be restored.</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"></p>
<p></span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you think that you should make the decision about who to help with your money and how much you should give them, then you my young friend are not liberal, you are conservative.</span><br />
</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not the NRA!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[militia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party clearly supports the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.&#160; The problem is that the NRA has weakened the 2nd Amendment to the point that the popular understanding is that we have the right to keep and bear arms either to hunt or to protect ourselves and our property. The Second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Tea Party clearly supports the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.&nbsp; The problem is that the NRA has <em><strong>weakened </strong></em>the 2nd Amendment to the point that the popular understanding is that we have the right to keep and bear arms either to hunt or to protect ourselves and our property.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Second Amendment reads, &ldquo;<strong>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed</strong>.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Thus our right to keep and bear arms is not to hunt or to keep thugs from stealing our stuff &hellip;</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"> it&rsquo;s to have citizens armed with weapons and able to form militias to protect our State from oppressive governments!</span></strong></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Funny how it seems to get back to an out of control Federal government usurping the rights of individuals and States.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Anarchy!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&#160; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist. These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&nbsp; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist.</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at best.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;">&nbsp; The Tea Party supports the 10 Amendment, &ldquo;<strong>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people</strong>.&rdquo;&nbsp; In other words the Federal governments powers and authority are limited to those few and specific things assigned to it.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">A simple way to understand this is that <em><strong>your problems and needs should be handled as close to you as possible.</strong></em>&nbsp; You are responsible to provide and protect yourself.&nbsp; In some instances that job will be too big for you.&nbsp; At those times those things should be handled by your family, then your community, then your State, then the Federal government.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Today we&rsquo;ve turned that on it&rsquo;s head and look to the Federal government first to fix our problems and provide for us.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Tea Party is not for Anarchy, it is for each person and entity assuming its proper role and authority.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Christian!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom from religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I realize that in yesterday&#8217;s article I stated that America was founded on Biblical principles.&#160; This is factual.&#160; However, the Tea Party is not a &#8220;Christian&#8221; group.&#160; The Tea Party stands for the Constitution. The principles of the Constitution are based on, or inspired by Biblical principles, Biblical principles reflect the character of God.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Now I realize that in yesterday&rsquo;s article I stated that America was founded on Biblical principles.&nbsp; This is factual.&nbsp; However, the Tea Party is not a &ldquo;Christian&rdquo; group.&nbsp; The Tea Party stands for the Constitution.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The principles of the Constitution are based on, or inspired by Biblical principles, Biblical principles reflect the character of God.&nbsp; Many people won&rsquo;t understand this but let me explain rationally and equivocally using one characteristic of God as an example.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">God is love.&nbsp; God wants us to love others as He does.&nbsp; Life experience and logic tell you that if you kidnapped someone and forced them to &ldquo;love&rdquo; you, that would not be true love.&nbsp; Love requires choice not force or coercion.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">One application of that Biblical principle based on the character of God is that in America you have freedom <em><strong>of</strong></em> religion (not freedom &ldquo;<em><strong>from</strong></em>&rdquo; religion).&nbsp; Each person has the right to choose to worship or not as he or she chooses.&nbsp; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Why?&nbsp; <em><strong>Because God loves you, He will not force you to love Him.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, the application of this Biblical principle is an example of America&rsquo;s supremacy over many other nations.&nbsp; In many nations today you do not have the freedom to exercise religion, or your choice of which religion to practice is forced upon you.&nbsp; As I write this article there is a Christian father in Iran who is facing execution because he refused to renounce his Christian faith and return to Islam.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Thus The Tea Party, like our Constitution is not trying to establish a religion, it&#8217;s trying to protect everyone&#8217;s rights by relying on the wisdom of our Founders who based our laws on </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">Biblical principles.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The bottom line is that if you are an Atheist, Muslim, Pagan, Christian, Agnostic, et.al &#8230; you have the Liberty to hold and express those views because that is your God-given right protected by our Constitution.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Libertarian!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like there are many Republicans involved in the Tea Party there is also many Libertarians in the Tea Party.&#160; To both groups I state the following: If your political party comes before conservative principles you are not a member of the Tea Party. When it comes to our Libertarian friends two issues jump out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Just like there are many Republicans involved in the Tea Party there is also many Libertarians in the Tea Party.&nbsp; To both groups I state the following:<em><strong> If your political party comes before conservative principles you are not a member of the Tea Party.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">When it comes to our Libertarian friends two issues jump out at me right away; <em><strong>Morals matter and Religion matters.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">While we share many concerns with Libertarians, especially when it comes to the economy, what distinguishes Tea Party members is that<em><strong> it is not ONLY about the economy</strong></em>.&nbsp; Our Founding Fathers were clear, in order for this nation to survive it must by lead my moral people held accountable by moral people.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Character matters.&nbsp; Social issues such as abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research are important.&nbsp; What is taught to our children in schools about tolerance, sex and history are important.&nbsp; And maintaining a strong military is essential.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">We cannot be scared away from acknowledging the fact that America is a great, prosperous, tolerant, generous, law-abiding nation because she was founded on Biblical principles.&nbsp; To the degree that we stray from that will erode our national character and benefits.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not GOP!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay I&#8217;ll start here since this is precisely where I started with my local Tea Party group and offended a bunch of uptight Republicans. I understand the strategic need to use the Republican Party to get candidates into office.&#160; However, some well-meaning GOP&#8217;ers simply can&#8217;t wrap their conditioned mind around the concept that we are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Okay I&rsquo;ll start here since this is precisely where I started with my local Tea Party group and offended a bunch of uptight Republicans.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I understand the strategic need to use the Republican Party to get candidates into office.&nbsp; However, some well-meaning GOP&rsquo;ers simply can&rsquo;t wrap their conditioned mind around the concept that we are not a &ldquo;plank&rdquo; of the GOP, we&rsquo;re not a bunch of disenfranchised members of the Republican Party, and we&rsquo;re not capable of being bullied by their usual tactics!<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Let me state our relationship with the Republican Party plainly and clearly:&nbsp; Like it or not we live in a two party system.&nbsp; <em><strong>The Tea Party is strategically using the GOP to get conservative candidates in office.</strong></em>&nbsp; We are doing that by replacing Liberal Republicans then winning elections against the other party.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Allow me to share two quick stories to illustrate this point.&nbsp; My first meeting as a leader of our local Tea Party was in a friend&rsquo;s house with about 20 other people.&nbsp; As I shared this concept I was met with some blank stares and some confused people nodding their heads.&nbsp; When this concept was applied to voting I asserted that I would not vote for a candidate who was not conservative simply because he/she had an &ldquo;R&rdquo; after their name.&nbsp; There was a group gasp followed by days of angry and concerned calls and emails.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Several months later I was having a breakfast meeting with the Chief of Staff for my local Congressman.&nbsp; He patiently explained to me how we needed to put up more liberal candidates in some areas so that we could win those seats to ensure a larger voting bloc in the house &hellip; blah, blah, blah.&nbsp; I chuckled and told him, &ldquo;That&rsquo;s not the way it works anymore.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s how it works.&nbsp; You put up conservative candidates and we will vote for them and they will win.&nbsp; You put up RJINO&rsquo;s and we will not vote for them and you will lose.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">The GOP thinks the Tea Party is a fringe of the Republican Party that they can use.&nbsp; They have it backwards.&nbsp; The Tea Party is a distinct voting bloc that is resolute.&nbsp; They are not using us, Rather we are using them!</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Intro</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-intro</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like to categorize things and people into groups; They associate new groups with existing groups that they&#8217;re familiar with then assume that they understand the new group based on their knowledge of the existing group. This is epidemic when it comes to the Tea Party.&#160; Liberals believe the Tea Party is just a fringe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">People like to categorize things and people into groups; They associate new groups with existing groups that they&rsquo;re familiar with then assume that they understand the new group based on their knowledge of the existing group.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
This is epidemic when it comes to the Tea Party.&nbsp; Liberals believe the Tea Party is just a fringe wing of the Republican Party.&nbsp; Republicans think it&rsquo;s the embarrassing Constitution carrying, Bible thumping element of their political party.&nbsp; Libertarians and Independents are just as confused.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">This week I will post a new article each day that briefly explains the differences.&nbsp; I will provide clarity to the muddy waters by describing how and why the GOP, Libertarians, Anarchist, NRA and Christian labels can&rsquo;t possibly summarize what the Tea Party is about.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Hold on &hellip; I&rsquo;m about to offend just about everybody &hellip; that is, everyone who&rsquo;s not truly a Tea Party member.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives Support Islamic Suppression of Women</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[womens rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine a world in a few years when women will have the right to vote!&#160; Religious leaders scoff while the leader of the nation floats the notion that women should have rights similar to men&#8217;s rights. No I&#8217;m not referring to America under the cruel and oppressive thumb of a Christian culture in the 1890&#8216;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Imagine a world in a few years when women will have the right to vote!&nbsp; Religious leaders scoff while the leader of the nation floats the notion that women should have rights similar to men&rsquo;s rights.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
No I&rsquo;m not referring to America under the cruel and oppressive thumb of a Christian culture in the <strong>1890</strong>&#8216;s <span style="font-size: 16px;">(deep sticky sarcasm)</span> &hellip; No, I&rsquo;m just reading the headlines from <strong>today</strong>&rsquo;s Wall Street Journal about the state of women living under the beautiful theocracy of Islam <span style="font-size: 16px;">(just to be clear &#8230; again, sarcastic)</span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
It seems that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia just can&rsquo;t convince clerics of the peaceful and respectful religion of Islam to see things his way.&nbsp; Apparently the progressive King thinks that it might be a swell idea to allow women to vote in 2015 (yes, 2015!).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">But don&rsquo;t worry he&rsquo;s not too radical, he does made the following concessions:<br />
&ldquo;Saudi women remain veiled and segregated and are forbidden to drive or to obtain their own identity cards.&nbsp; Women need written permission from a male relative in order to travel abroad.&rdquo; WSJ</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
(Huge sigh of relief &hellip;) I thought those silly Muslims might be getting a little liberal these days!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
Allow me to ask the obvious, yet unanswered question:&nbsp;<em><strong> Where is the public outrage from the Progressives, the Liberals, those who claim to stand for women&rsquo;s rights?</strong></em>&nbsp; You&rsquo;re silence is deafening and reveals that your true intentions are not as you claim.&nbsp; Your hypocrisy is blinding!&nbsp; You don&rsquo;t care about women; you care about your lust for power and profit!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Progressives your silence against Islam is support of their anti-women laws and culture.</span></strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Letter From A Friend</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/12/a-letter-from-a-friend/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-letter-from-a-friend</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/12/a-letter-from-a-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read these words today and printed them with approval of the author (I&#8217;ve added the emphasis). Most days I feel like I&#8217;m the only one going through hard times.&#160; I hear talk about how most people are feeling the financial pressures these days.&#160; I see the high unemployment rate.&#160; But everyone&#8217;s still driving nice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">I read these words today and printed them with approval of the author (I&#8217;ve added the emphasis).</span></strong></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
Most days I feel like I&rsquo;m the only one going through hard times.&nbsp; I hear talk about how most people are feeling the financial pressures these days.&nbsp; I see the high unemployment rate.&nbsp; But everyone&rsquo;s still driving nice cars, wearing the latest fashions, and enjoying the amusements of life.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I don&rsquo;t see food lines, unemployed people looking for work, or good hardworking people on the streets.&nbsp; I guess it&rsquo;s because today we have <em><strong>government assistance programs that puts a fa&ccedil;ade on the suffering</strong></em> and enables those of us experiencing <strong>the Second Great Depression</strong> to hide behind food stamps and unemployment compensation.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The result is that no one really sees the true magnitude of how bad things really are, and an increased dependency on the government to provide for our daily needs.&nbsp; Tragically the silent consequences are also broken marriages, depressed individuals and increased suicides in people between the ages 40 and 64.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">No, I&rsquo;m not considering suicide, but I do go through times of depression and my marriage is on the rocks.&nbsp; I&rsquo;ve got a nice resume that includes management with a well known company, I have an MBA, I&rsquo;m a hard worker, yet I&rsquo;m working 3 jobs and earned less last year then I&rsquo;ve earned in the past 20 years.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I understand that economies are cyclical and that perhaps part of the problem is just bad luck of being born and </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">raising a family when the economy moved into a natural cycle.&nbsp; But I think the greatest catalyst has been progressive fiscal and monetary policies from our federal government and the Federal Reserve.&nbsp; Both political parties are to blame.&nbsp; Power hungry permanent political class who care more for their carries than for our liberty is the problem.<br />
</span></p>
<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Thus I guess the beginning of the solution is to vote ALL these arrogant and selfish idiots out of office and replace them with Patriots.&nbsp; The road to health individually and as a nation is a long hard one.&nbsp; I&rsquo;m willing to walk it, if you&rsquo;ll walk beside me.</span></strong></em><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/12/a-letter-from-a-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America, the new Sodom and Gomorrah</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/08/26/america-the-new-sodom-and-gomorrah/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=america-the-new-sodom-and-gomorrah</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/08/26/america-the-new-sodom-and-gomorrah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b4u-act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedophilia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fifty years ago homosexuality was illegal in the United States, it was considered immoral and unnatural.&#160; In 1962 Illinois became the first state in the U.S. to decriminalize homosexual acts between consenting adults in private. It was still believed to be abnormal, dare I say &#8220;sinful&#8221; behavior.&#160; But the culture of sex in America changed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Fifty years ago homosexuality was illegal in the United States, it was considered immoral and unnatural.&nbsp; In 1962 Illinois became the first state in the U.S. to decriminalize homosexual acts between consenting adults in private.</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
It was still believed to be abnormal, dare I say &ldquo;sinful&rdquo; behavior.&nbsp; But the culture of sex in America changed significantly in the 1960&rsquo;s and in 1973 The American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its official list of mental disorders.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">&ldquo;Hey who are we to pass judgment against what types of sexual behavior people engage in private.&rdquo;&nbsp; After all, the enlightened reasoned, &ldquo;it&rsquo;s not a mental disorder, in fact it&rsquo;s coded in their DNA just like the color of someone&rsquo;s eyes &hellip; therefore it&rsquo;s actually natural for them.&rdquo;&nbsp; In fact we must not only tolerate homosexuality, we must embrace it as natural, healthy and good.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Christians were branded as &ldquo;intolerant&rdquo; &ldquo;hate-mongers&rdquo; and &ldquo;narrow-minded&rdquo; making ignorant moral judgments against homosexuals, and naive arguments about a &ldquo;slippery slope.&rdquo;</strong></em></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
Bible-thumping religious zealots made ridiculous claims that the arguments used to defend the behavior of homosexuals would necessarily be successful when used to defend other sexually abnormal and unnatural behavior such as bestiality and pedophilia among others.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Yesterday (August 24, 2011) it was reported that a group of 38 of clinicians, researchers and academics gathered for a scientific symposium to discuss a proposed new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">With the strategic backing of the non-profit B4U-Act they believe that pedophiles should not carry the stigma of being criminal child abusers.&nbsp; Rather it is a genetic predisposition.&nbsp; They should be tolerated and their behavior understood.&nbsp; After all it&#8217;s just as natural to them as the color of their eyes.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
<em><strong>Pedophilias should not suffer the negative innuendos of that name either, but rather they should be called &ldquo;<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Minor-attracted people</span>.&rdquo;</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The argument is the same.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s coded into their DNA.&nbsp; They are victimized by the stigma of an outdated moral culture.&nbsp; What&rsquo;s needed is a new understanding, new definitions of normalcy.&nbsp; Those who are intolerant of this medical condition are simply naive.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">The only barrier to overcome is how we as a culture will find a way to justify their young victims as consenting sexual partners.&nbsp; What horrifies me is that the left will find a way to do that &hellip; <em><strong>they&rsquo;ve already legalized the murder of defenseless children, why not their rape too.</strong></em></span></p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">For the sake of our children, and out of fear of a Holy God &hellip; Stand and fight against this sin!</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Documentation:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.b4uact.org/news/20110817.htm" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 18px;">B4U-Act Press Release</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/middle-class-guy/2011/aug/17/b4uact-seek-acceptance-minor-attracted-pedophiles/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Washington Times Article</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/08/26/america-the-new-sodom-and-gomorrah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

