<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tea Party Roundtable &#187; National Sovereignty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teapartyroundtable.com/category/national-sovereignty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com</link>
	<description>Returning To Our Foundations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman McKeon is Inept!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/12/21/congressman-mckeon-is-inept/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=congressman-mckeon-is-inept</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/12/21/congressman-mckeon-is-inept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHAT TO DO THIS WEEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dante acosta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Acosta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incompetence!&#160; I just read Jim Holt&#8217;s article &#8220;Army investigation not handed over to Armed Services Committee chair for 8 months&#8221; and I am amazed at the incompetence at all levels of government. A young bright star was extinguished on March 19, 2011.&#160; Army Spc. Rudy Acosta a 19 year old from Santa Clarita was killed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Incompetence!</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;">&nbsp; I just read Jim Holt&rsquo;s article &ldquo;<a href="http://www.the-signal.com/m/section/36/article/56624/" target="_blank">Army investigation not handed over to Armed Services Committee chair for 8 months</a>&rdquo; and I am amazed at the incompetence at all levels of government.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">A young bright star was extinguished on March 19, 2011.&nbsp; Army Spc. Rudy Acosta a 19 year old from Santa Clarita was killed by a foreign national paid to guard our troops in battle.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Mr. Holt sites a letter from our Congressman Buck McKeon which was sent to the Signal and to Leon Panetta, our Secretary of Defense.&nbsp; In it apparently Congressman McKeon expresses his &ldquo;disappointment&rdquo; about how long it took to get the report, and he &ldquo;identified several areas and procedures that could be improved to prevent future insurgent attacks of this nature.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you kidding me?&nbsp; This is absurd and patronizing first to the Acosta family and secondly to us, whom the Congressman is suppose to represent!<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">First, let&rsquo;s fix the immediate issue.&nbsp; <em><strong>Don&rsquo;t let citizens of nations that we&rsquo;re at war with guard our troops.&nbsp; Rather have either our troops guard themselves or at least US private contractors</strong></em> &hellip; Duh!&nbsp; This is simply common sense.&nbsp; Would you have criminal street gangs guard our police and sheriff stations?&nbsp; Would you have child molesters guard our schools?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">This is not a complex issue requiring committee meetings and reports.&nbsp; When our troops are eating meals, sleeping, or enjoying some much needed down time, they should not have to worry that the person guarding them might kill them.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Second, the bigger issue &hellip; massive governmental incompetence from our local Congressman to the Secretary of Defense.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Congressman McKeon is the &ldquo;Chairman of the Committee of Armed Services&rdquo; for goodness sake!&nbsp; Assuming he&rsquo;s being truthful (which I doubt) this means that our government is completely inept.&nbsp; If the Chairman of the Committee of Armed Services can&rsquo;t get a simple report from the military than who can?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, according to the story the report was actually completed on April 14.&nbsp; That means that Congressman McKeon sat on his hands for 8 months!&nbsp; He should have demanded that as soon as the report was completed it is to be delivered to his desk.&nbsp; Or at minimum McKeon should have been checking regularly on the status of the report, clearly he was not.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">So what then was the catalyst causing the Chairman of the Committee of Armed Services to check on such an important report?&nbsp; Well, he received on Friday, December 16, the day after the Signal reported a story on this issue, and three days after McKeon&rsquo;s Chief of Staff was confronted by Mr. Acosta (Rudy&rsquo;s dad) at a local GOP event.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Apparently it takes public disclosure of their incompetence for the McKeon machine to do their job.&nbsp; Congressman McKeon has a duty to provide oversight to our military.&nbsp; He is our voice to protect our young men and women serving in the military.&nbsp; Congressman McKeon has a duty to provide answers to a grieving family in his district.&nbsp; He has failed on both accounts.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">It&#8217;s time to vote out Congressman McKeon and replace him with someone who will do their job!<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/12/21/congressman-mckeon-is-inept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanksgiving Proclamation</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/24/thanksgiving-proclamation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thanksgiving-proclamation</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/24/thanksgiving-proclamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thanksgiving proclamaion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is the Thanksgiving proclamation from President George Washington &#8230; My how far we have strayed from our founding! Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and whereas both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><em><strong>Below is the Thanksgiving proclamation from President George Washington &#8230; My how far we have strayed from our founding!</strong></em></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me &quot;to recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.&quot;</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
G. Washington.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/24/thanksgiving-proclamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=illegal-immigration</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&#160; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants. Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&nbsp; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug trafficking and human trafficking.&nbsp; If it&#8217;s this easy for thugs to illegally cross the border undetected how much more is it for terrorists who plan for years their strategies?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">We must deal swiftly and resolutely with the border issue for our security and economic survival.&nbsp; However we also need to figure out what to do with those <em><strong>illegal </strong></em>immigrants who have come here just to work and have been here for many years.&nbsp; Many of them have raised families, which adds to the economic burden but must be acknowledged.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The crime of illegally immigrating to the United States must be punished, and it can be done in a humane way using common sense and justice.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s my simple idea:</p>
<p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">1. If you&rsquo;ve been here for less than 10 years with no criminal history you get deported with an option to return legally.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">2. If you have been convicted of any felony you get deported and refused re-entry permanently.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">3. If you&rsquo;ve been here for longer than 10 years with no criminal history you are given temporary transitional visas under the following guidelines:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You must acquire legal residency within 5 years</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You&rsquo;re wages are garnished for back taxes of $4,000 per year, split evenly between the state and federal government (that would be equivalent to what they would have paid in federal taxes if they earned about $27,000 annually)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">Any felony conviction results in immediate deportation with permanently refused re-entry
<p>    </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;m sure this plan is not perfect, but let&rsquo;s bring some sanity to this problem and solve it!</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank a Vet!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/11/thank-a-vet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thank-a-vet</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/11/thank-a-vet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you happy that you can protest your government? &#8211; Thank a Vet Are you grateful that you can worship or not as you want? &#8211; Thank a Vet Are you glad that you speak English instead of German or Japanese? &#8211; Thank a Vet Are you excited to publicly express being gay? &#8211; Thank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you happy that you can protest your government? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you grateful that you can worship or not as you want? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you glad that you speak English instead of German or Japanese? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you excited to publicly express being gay? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you empowered because you can vote? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Are you thankful that you can sit in front of a government building for weeks demanding to be given benefits paid for by the very people you complain about, while other men and women are sitting thousands of miles away from their homes risking their lives in some stinking desert? &ndash; <strong>Thank a Vet!</strong><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/11/thank-a-vet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative &#8220;Bubble&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=conservative-bubble</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sitting in Starbucks next to a couple college girls who were talking about politics.&#160; One girl said that her parents are &#8220;Republican and all that&#8221; and mused that it would be nice to &#8220;marry someone who is liberal to balance it out.&#8221;&#160; She went on to say that she wanted to &#8220;get outside [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I was sitting in Starbucks next to a couple college girls who were talking about politics.&nbsp; One girl said that her parents are &ldquo;Republican and all that&rdquo; and mused that it would be nice to &ldquo;marry someone who is liberal to balance it out.&rdquo;&nbsp; She went on to say that she wanted to &ldquo;get outside that bubble.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">My dear young friend, It&rsquo;s not a &ldquo;bubble&rdquo; it&rsquo;s a value system.&nbsp; If someone is Republican they might be either liberal or conservative.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you are liberal you believe that the federal government has the primary responsibility to protect you and provide for your needs.&nbsp; They believe we are protected by government regulations, and we are provided for by taking money out of your paycheck and giving some of the money you&rsquo;ve earned to other people.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you are conservative you believe that the federal government&rsquo;s responsibilities are outlined and limited to what is in the Constitution and the subsequent Amendments.&nbsp; Specifically:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">Protecting citizens God-given rights (on-going)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> National Defense (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing Federal Courts (done)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Copyright Protection (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing a national set of weights and measures (done)<br />
    </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;"> Establishing Post Office (on-going)<br />
    </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Everything else should be taken care of by the individual citizen or the state government.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 18px;">The problem with getting outside a &ldquo;bubble&rdquo; is that requires destroying the bubble &hellip; and that bubble can never be restored.</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"></p>
<p></span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">If you think that you should make the decision about who to help with your money and how much you should give them, then you my young friend are not liberal, you are conservative.</span><br />
</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/03/conservative-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not the NRA!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[militia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party clearly supports the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.&#160; The problem is that the NRA has weakened the 2nd Amendment to the point that the popular understanding is that we have the right to keep and bear arms either to hunt or to protect ourselves and our property. The Second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Tea Party clearly supports the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.&nbsp; The problem is that the NRA has <em><strong>weakened </strong></em>the 2nd Amendment to the point that the popular understanding is that we have the right to keep and bear arms either to hunt or to protect ourselves and our property.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Second Amendment reads, &ldquo;<strong>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed</strong>.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Thus our right to keep and bear arms is not to hunt or to keep thugs from stealing our stuff &hellip;</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"> it&rsquo;s to have citizens armed with weapons and able to form militias to protect our State from oppressive governments!</span></strong></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Funny how it seems to get back to an out of control Federal government usurping the rights of individuals and States.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/07/what-is-the-tea-party-not-the-nra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Anarchy!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&#160; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist. These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&nbsp; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist.</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at best.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;">&nbsp; The Tea Party supports the 10 Amendment, &ldquo;<strong>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people</strong>.&rdquo;&nbsp; In other words the Federal governments powers and authority are limited to those few and specific things assigned to it.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">A simple way to understand this is that <em><strong>your problems and needs should be handled as close to you as possible.</strong></em>&nbsp; You are responsible to provide and protect yourself.&nbsp; In some instances that job will be too big for you.&nbsp; At those times those things should be handled by your family, then your community, then your State, then the Federal government.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Today we&rsquo;ve turned that on it&rsquo;s head and look to the Federal government first to fix our problems and provide for us.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Tea Party is not for Anarchy, it is for each person and entity assuming its proper role and authority.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Christian!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom from religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I realize that in yesterday&#8217;s article I stated that America was founded on Biblical principles.&#160; This is factual.&#160; However, the Tea Party is not a &#8220;Christian&#8221; group.&#160; The Tea Party stands for the Constitution. The principles of the Constitution are based on, or inspired by Biblical principles, Biblical principles reflect the character of God.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Now I realize that in yesterday&rsquo;s article I stated that America was founded on Biblical principles.&nbsp; This is factual.&nbsp; However, the Tea Party is not a &ldquo;Christian&rdquo; group.&nbsp; The Tea Party stands for the Constitution.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The principles of the Constitution are based on, or inspired by Biblical principles, Biblical principles reflect the character of God.&nbsp; Many people won&rsquo;t understand this but let me explain rationally and equivocally using one characteristic of God as an example.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">God is love.&nbsp; God wants us to love others as He does.&nbsp; Life experience and logic tell you that if you kidnapped someone and forced them to &ldquo;love&rdquo; you, that would not be true love.&nbsp; Love requires choice not force or coercion.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">One application of that Biblical principle based on the character of God is that in America you have freedom <em><strong>of</strong></em> religion (not freedom &ldquo;<em><strong>from</strong></em>&rdquo; religion).&nbsp; Each person has the right to choose to worship or not as he or she chooses.&nbsp; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Why?&nbsp; <em><strong>Because God loves you, He will not force you to love Him.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, the application of this Biblical principle is an example of America&rsquo;s supremacy over many other nations.&nbsp; In many nations today you do not have the freedom to exercise religion, or your choice of which religion to practice is forced upon you.&nbsp; As I write this article there is a Christian father in Iran who is facing execution because he refused to renounce his Christian faith and return to Islam.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Thus The Tea Party, like our Constitution is not trying to establish a religion, it&#8217;s trying to protect everyone&#8217;s rights by relying on the wisdom of our Founders who based our laws on </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">Biblical principles.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The bottom line is that if you are an Atheist, Muslim, Pagan, Christian, Agnostic, et.al &#8230; you have the Liberty to hold and express those views because that is your God-given right protected by our Constitution.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/05/what-is-the-tea-party-not-christian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Libertarian!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like there are many Republicans involved in the Tea Party there is also many Libertarians in the Tea Party.&#160; To both groups I state the following: If your political party comes before conservative principles you are not a member of the Tea Party. When it comes to our Libertarian friends two issues jump out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Just like there are many Republicans involved in the Tea Party there is also many Libertarians in the Tea Party.&nbsp; To both groups I state the following:<em><strong> If your political party comes before conservative principles you are not a member of the Tea Party.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">When it comes to our Libertarian friends two issues jump out at me right away; <em><strong>Morals matter and Religion matters.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">While we share many concerns with Libertarians, especially when it comes to the economy, what distinguishes Tea Party members is that<em><strong> it is not ONLY about the economy</strong></em>.&nbsp; Our Founding Fathers were clear, in order for this nation to survive it must by lead my moral people held accountable by moral people.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Character matters.&nbsp; Social issues such as abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research are important.&nbsp; What is taught to our children in schools about tolerance, sex and history are important.&nbsp; And maintaining a strong military is essential.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">We cannot be scared away from acknowledging the fact that America is a great, prosperous, tolerant, generous, law-abiding nation because she was founded on Biblical principles.&nbsp; To the degree that we stray from that will erode our national character and benefits.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/04/what-is-the-tea-party-not-libertarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not GOP!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay I&#8217;ll start here since this is precisely where I started with my local Tea Party group and offended a bunch of uptight Republicans. I understand the strategic need to use the Republican Party to get candidates into office.&#160; However, some well-meaning GOP&#8217;ers simply can&#8217;t wrap their conditioned mind around the concept that we are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Okay I&rsquo;ll start here since this is precisely where I started with my local Tea Party group and offended a bunch of uptight Republicans.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I understand the strategic need to use the Republican Party to get candidates into office.&nbsp; However, some well-meaning GOP&rsquo;ers simply can&rsquo;t wrap their conditioned mind around the concept that we are not a &ldquo;plank&rdquo; of the GOP, we&rsquo;re not a bunch of disenfranchised members of the Republican Party, and we&rsquo;re not capable of being bullied by their usual tactics!<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Let me state our relationship with the Republican Party plainly and clearly:&nbsp; Like it or not we live in a two party system.&nbsp; <em><strong>The Tea Party is strategically using the GOP to get conservative candidates in office.</strong></em>&nbsp; We are doing that by replacing Liberal Republicans then winning elections against the other party.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Allow me to share two quick stories to illustrate this point.&nbsp; My first meeting as a leader of our local Tea Party was in a friend&rsquo;s house with about 20 other people.&nbsp; As I shared this concept I was met with some blank stares and some confused people nodding their heads.&nbsp; When this concept was applied to voting I asserted that I would not vote for a candidate who was not conservative simply because he/she had an &ldquo;R&rdquo; after their name.&nbsp; There was a group gasp followed by days of angry and concerned calls and emails.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Several months later I was having a breakfast meeting with the Chief of Staff for my local Congressman.&nbsp; He patiently explained to me how we needed to put up more liberal candidates in some areas so that we could win those seats to ensure a larger voting bloc in the house &hellip; blah, blah, blah.&nbsp; I chuckled and told him, &ldquo;That&rsquo;s not the way it works anymore.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s how it works.&nbsp; You put up conservative candidates and we will vote for them and they will win.&nbsp; You put up RJINO&rsquo;s and we will not vote for them and you will lose.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">The GOP thinks the Tea Party is a fringe of the Republican Party that they can use.&nbsp; They have it backwards.&nbsp; The Tea Party is a distinct voting bloc that is resolute.&nbsp; They are not using us, Rather we are using them!</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/03/what-is-the-tea-party-not-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Intro</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-intro</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like to categorize things and people into groups; They associate new groups with existing groups that they&#8217;re familiar with then assume that they understand the new group based on their knowledge of the existing group. This is epidemic when it comes to the Tea Party.&#160; Liberals believe the Tea Party is just a fringe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">People like to categorize things and people into groups; They associate new groups with existing groups that they&rsquo;re familiar with then assume that they understand the new group based on their knowledge of the existing group.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
This is epidemic when it comes to the Tea Party.&nbsp; Liberals believe the Tea Party is just a fringe wing of the Republican Party.&nbsp; Republicans think it&rsquo;s the embarrassing Constitution carrying, Bible thumping element of their political party.&nbsp; Libertarians and Independents are just as confused.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">This week I will post a new article each day that briefly explains the differences.&nbsp; I will provide clarity to the muddy waters by describing how and why the GOP, Libertarians, Anarchist, NRA and Christian labels can&rsquo;t possibly summarize what the Tea Party is about.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Hold on &hellip; I&rsquo;m about to offend just about everybody &hellip; that is, everyone who&rsquo;s not truly a Tea Party member.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/02/what-is-the-tea-party-intro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives Support Islamic Suppression of Women</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[womens rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine a world in a few years when women will have the right to vote!&#160; Religious leaders scoff while the leader of the nation floats the notion that women should have rights similar to men&#8217;s rights. No I&#8217;m not referring to America under the cruel and oppressive thumb of a Christian culture in the 1890&#8216;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Imagine a world in a few years when women will have the right to vote!&nbsp; Religious leaders scoff while the leader of the nation floats the notion that women should have rights similar to men&rsquo;s rights.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
No I&rsquo;m not referring to America under the cruel and oppressive thumb of a Christian culture in the <strong>1890</strong>&#8216;s <span style="font-size: 16px;">(deep sticky sarcasm)</span> &hellip; No, I&rsquo;m just reading the headlines from <strong>today</strong>&rsquo;s Wall Street Journal about the state of women living under the beautiful theocracy of Islam <span style="font-size: 16px;">(just to be clear &#8230; again, sarcastic)</span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
It seems that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia just can&rsquo;t convince clerics of the peaceful and respectful religion of Islam to see things his way.&nbsp; Apparently the progressive King thinks that it might be a swell idea to allow women to vote in 2015 (yes, 2015!).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">But don&rsquo;t worry he&rsquo;s not too radical, he does made the following concessions:<br />
&ldquo;Saudi women remain veiled and segregated and are forbidden to drive or to obtain their own identity cards.&nbsp; Women need written permission from a male relative in order to travel abroad.&rdquo; WSJ</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
(Huge sigh of relief &hellip;) I thought those silly Muslims might be getting a little liberal these days!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
Allow me to ask the obvious, yet unanswered question:&nbsp;<em><strong> Where is the public outrage from the Progressives, the Liberals, those who claim to stand for women&rsquo;s rights?</strong></em>&nbsp; You&rsquo;re silence is deafening and reveals that your true intentions are not as you claim.&nbsp; Your hypocrisy is blinding!&nbsp; You don&rsquo;t care about women; you care about your lust for power and profit!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Progressives your silence against Islam is support of their anti-women laws and culture.</span></strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/09/26/progressives-support-islamic-suppression-of-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

