<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tea Party Roundtable &#187; Government Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teapartyroundtable.com/category/government-health-care-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com</link>
	<description>Returning To Our Foundations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We Stand Against Romney</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=we-stand-against-romney</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHAT TO DO THIS WEEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney is not a Conservative, in fact it is fair to say that he is Liberal. Tea Party RoundTable urges you to not vote for Romney. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px; ">Mitt Romney is not a Conservative, in fact it is fair to say that he is Liberal.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px; ">Tea Party RoundTable urges you to not vote for Romney.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qyp2QIGejq4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2012/01/18/we-stand-against-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=illegal-immigration</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&#160; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants. Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Our porous borders are both an economic problem and a security problem.&nbsp; States like California are Arizona feeling the massive economic blow of illegal immigration, but it affects every state and the federal government with the cost of supporting the families of illegal immigrants.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Moreover, these states also suffer the greatest casualties from gangs, drug trafficking and human trafficking.&nbsp; If it&#8217;s this easy for thugs to illegally cross the border undetected how much more is it for terrorists who plan for years their strategies?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">We must deal swiftly and resolutely with the border issue for our security and economic survival.&nbsp; However we also need to figure out what to do with those <em><strong>illegal </strong></em>immigrants who have come here just to work and have been here for many years.&nbsp; Many of them have raised families, which adds to the economic burden but must be acknowledged.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The crime of illegally immigrating to the United States must be punished, and it can be done in a humane way using common sense and justice.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s my simple idea:</p>
<p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">1. If you&rsquo;ve been here for less than 10 years with no criminal history you get deported with an option to return legally.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">2. If you have been convicted of any felony you get deported and refused re-entry permanently.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">3. If you&rsquo;ve been here for longer than 10 years with no criminal history you are given temporary transitional visas under the following guidelines:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You must acquire legal residency within 5 years</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">You&rsquo;re wages are garnished for back taxes of $4,000 per year, split evenly between the state and federal government (that would be equivalent to what they would have paid in federal taxes if they earned about $27,000 annually)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18px;">Any felony conviction results in immediate deportation with permanently refused re-entry
<p>    </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;m sure this plan is not perfect, but let&rsquo;s bring some sanity to this problem and solve it!</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/11/23/illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Tea Party? ~ Not Anarchy!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&#160; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist. These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">I&rsquo;ve heard people from both political parties allude to the Tea Party as Anarchist.&nbsp; Out of fear for their own jobs or simply out of ignorant bias they conclude that if someone wants to limit the Federal government in any way they must by an Anarchist.</span><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">These people are either woefully ignorant, or disingenuous at best.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;">&nbsp; The Tea Party supports the 10 Amendment, &ldquo;<strong>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people</strong>.&rdquo;&nbsp; In other words the Federal governments powers and authority are limited to those few and specific things assigned to it.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">A simple way to understand this is that <em><strong>your problems and needs should be handled as close to you as possible.</strong></em>&nbsp; You are responsible to provide and protect yourself.&nbsp; In some instances that job will be too big for you.&nbsp; At those times those things should be handled by your family, then your community, then your State, then the Federal government.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Today we&rsquo;ve turned that on it&rsquo;s head and look to the Federal government first to fix our problems and provide for us.</span></strong></em><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Tea Party is not for Anarchy, it is for each person and entity assuming its proper role and authority.</span><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/10/06/what-is-the-tea-party-not-anarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economy Is Worse Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/06/09/the-economy-is-worse-than-you-think/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-economy-is-worse-than-you-think</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/06/09/the-economy-is-worse-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 03:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expect more bad news until someone enacts a plan to bring deficits under control without raising taxes. The policies of the Obama administration have led to the weak condition of the American economy. Growth during the coming year will be subpar at best, leaving high or rising levels of unemployment and underemployment. The drop in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Expect more bad news until someone enacts a plan to bring deficits under control without raising taxes.</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 17px;">The policies of the Obama administration have led to the weak condition of the American economy. Growth during the coming year will be subpar at best, leaving high or rising levels of unemployment and underemployment.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 17px;">The drop in GDP growth to just 1.8% in the first quarter of 2011, from 3.1% in the final quarter of last year, understates the extent of the decline. Two-thirds of that 1.8% went into business inventories rather than sales to consumers or other final buyers. This means that final sales growth was at an annual rate of just 0.6% and the actual quarterly increase was just 0.15%&mdash;dangerously close to no rise at all. A sustained expansion cannot be built on inventory investment. It takes final sales to induce businesses to hire and to invest.</p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 17px;">The picture is even gloomier if we look in more detail. Estimates of monthly GDP indicate that the only growth in the first quarter of 2011 was from February to March. After a temporary rise in March, the economy began sliding again in April, with declines in real wages, in durable-goods orders and manufacturing production, in existing home sales, and in real per-capita disposable incomes. It is not surprising that the index of leading indicators fell in April, only the second decline since it began to rise in the spring of 2009.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 17px;"><br />
See the complete article By MARTIN FELDSTEIN in WSJ </span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303657404576363984173620692.html"><span style="font-size: 17px;">here</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 17px;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">.</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/06/09/the-economy-is-worse-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s a Tool for Racism Against Blacks</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/02/21/obamas-a-tool-for-racism-aganist-blacks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-a-tool-for-racism-aganist-blacks</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/02/21/obamas-a-tool-for-racism-aganist-blacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margaret sanger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negro project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planed parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><iframe width="480" height="390" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YI67MuPwsX0?rel=0" title="YouTube video player"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/02/21/obamas-a-tool-for-racism-aganist-blacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Doctor Charged With Murder</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/24/abortion-doctor-charged-with-murder/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=abortion-doctor-charged-with-murder</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/24/abortion-doctor-charged-with-murder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partial birth abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend marked the anniversary of Roe v. Wade which is when abortion was made legal. Millions of hearts are stopped each year by &#34;medical professionals&#34; who are providing these Federally funded &#34;Legal, Safe and Rare&#34; abortions. Our current president is one of the most staunch supporters of abortion including the butchering of viable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">This past weekend marked the anniversary of Roe v. Wade which is when abortion was made legal.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Millions of hearts are stopped each year by &quot;medical professionals&quot; who are providing these Federally funded &quot;Legal, Safe and Rare&quot; abortions.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Our current president is one of the most staunch supporters of abortion including the butchering of viable children through the process they call &quot;partial birth abortions.&quot;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">It is timely that this news story came out to remind us of this great national crime!</span></p>
<p><object height="280" width="320" data="http://www.myfoxdc.com/video/videoplayer.swf?dppversion=6994" id="video" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="movie" value="http://www.myfoxdc.com/video/videoplayer.swf?dppversion=6994" /><param name="FlashVars" value="&amp;skin=MP1ExternalAll-MFL.swf&amp;embed=true&amp;adSizeArray=300x240&amp;adSrc=http%3A%2F%2Fad%2Edoubleclick%2Enet%2Fadx%2Ftsg%2Ewttg%2Fnews%2Fmetro%2Fdetail%3Bdcmt%3Dtext%2Fxml%3Bpos%3D%3Btile%3D2%3Bfname%3Dphiladelphia%2Dabortion%2Ddoctor%2Daccused%2Dof%2Dkilling%2Dwoodbridge%2Dva%2Dwoman%2D012111%3Bloc%3Dsite%3Bsz%3D320x240%3Bord%3D5676607318996221%3Frand%3D0%2E6181082328458273&amp;flv=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Emyfoxdc%2Ecom%2Ffeeds%2FoutboundFeed%3FobfType%3DVIDEO%5FPLAYER%5FSMIL%5FFEED%26componentId%3D134191503&amp;img=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia2%2Emyfoxdc%2Ecom%2F%2Fphoto%2F2011%2F01%2F21%2FKarnamayaMongar%5F20110121231331%5F640%5F480%2EJPG&amp;story=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Emyfoxdc%2Ecom%2Fdpp%2Fnews%2Flocal%2Fphiladelphia%2Dabortion%2Ddoctor%2Daccused%2Dof%2Dkilling%2Dwoodbridge%2Dva%2Dwoman%2D012111%3Futm%5Fsource%3Dco2hog&amp;category=news&amp;title=PhillyAbortionDrPlater11p%2Emov&amp;oacct=foximfoximwttg,foximglobal&amp;ovns=foxinteractivemedia&amp;headline=Philadelphia%20Abortion%20Doctor%20Accused%20of%20Killing%20Woodbridge%20Va%20Woman" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /></object></p>
<p style="width: 320px;"><a href="http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/philadelphia-abortion-doctor-accused-of-killing-woodbridge-va-woman-012111?utm_source=co2hog">Philadelphia Abortion Doctor Accused of Killing Woodbridge Va Woman: MyFoxDC.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/24/abortion-doctor-charged-with-murder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi and her ilk disgusts me!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/05/pelosi-and-her-ilk-disgusts-me/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pelosi-and-her-ilk-disgusts-me</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/05/pelosi-and-her-ilk-disgusts-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t stand this woman.&#160; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s so much her as an individual (as despicable as she is), no I think it&#8217;s that she embodies all that is evil about what the American political system has become. The complete lack of honesty, integrity and common sense is the hallmark of our elected officials. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">I can&rsquo;t stand this woman.&nbsp; I don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s so much her as an individual (as despicable as she is), no I think it&rsquo;s that she embodies all that is evil about what the American political system has become.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">The complete lack of honesty, integrity and common sense is the hallmark of our elected officials.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">I can&rsquo;t possibly begin to respond to what she says in this brief clip from AP because just about every sentence is rife with disingenuous innuendo and baseless accusations.&nbsp; But I will say this to her and her ilk &hellip;<span style="font-size: 18px;"><em><strong> It is not the role of government to fix our problems.&nbsp; Your job is to protect and defend our God given rights as outlined in our Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic &hellip; no more, no less!</strong></em></span><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">God save us from these people!</span></strong></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object height="340" width="560"><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwlAt2EYIOI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" name="movie" /><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /><embed height="340" width="560" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwlAt2EYIOI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2011/01/05/pelosi-and-her-ilk-disgusts-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP is not getting the message!</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/12/15/gop-is-not-getting-the-message/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gop-is-not-getting-the-message</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/12/15/gop-is-not-getting-the-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extend unemployment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s see &#8230; should we agree to extend a tax code for just 2 years that is at best difficult for American business and increase the size and scope of Federal spending forever, again!&#160; Or &#8230; roll up our sleeves and do what the American voters sent us into office last November to do? Clearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Let&rsquo;s see &hellip; should we agree to extend a tax code<strong> for just 2 years</strong> that is at best difficult for American business and increase the size and scope of Federal spending <strong>forever</strong>, again!&nbsp; Or &hellip; roll up our sleeves and do what the American voters sent us into office last November to do?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Clearly the GOP is on tenuous ground only one month after we kicked out the previous group of ne&rsquo;er-do-wells.&nbsp; I have only one short message for the Republicans that we just put into office:<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">You are there by our grace to do our bidding.&nbsp; If you refuse, and use your sacred office as a means for personal gain (like the previous crowd), you too will lose your job and will be replaced with honorable men and women who understand that We The People will not be tread on!</span></strong></em><br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/12/15/gop-is-not-getting-the-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Reform May Change the Face of Finance</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/14/financial-reform-may-change-the-face-of-finance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=financial-reform-may-change-the-face-of-finance</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/14/financial-reform-may-change-the-face-of-finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfpb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stability Oversight Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor protections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act &#8212; signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010 &#8212; will likely revolutionize the country&#8217;s financial system. The sweeping legislation is the most far-reaching financial reform since the Great Depression, touching virtually every corner of the financial world. The new law is designed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act &mdash;  signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010 &mdash; will likely  revolutionize the country&rsquo;s financial system. The sweeping legislation  is the most far-reaching financial reform since the Great Depression,  touching virtually every corner of the financial world.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The new law is designed to help shield consumers from abusive  financial practices, protect taxpayers from funding bailouts for  institutions considered &ldquo;too big to fail,&rdquo; and improve accountability  and transparency in the financial system.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Only a portion of the provisions included in the lengthy act actually  became effective when the bill was signed. It will be the job of  various regulatory agencies to write the rules that govern the act&rsquo;s  implementation. Consequently, it may be weeks, months, or even years  before consumers understand how the changes will work, and even longer  before their economic consequences are fully known.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Consumer Protection</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The cornerstone of the legislation is the creation of the Consumer  Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The new agency will be under the  Federal Reserve but is intended to operate autonomously. Its purpose is  to provide the public with information about financial products and to  help protect consumers from scams, hidden fees, abusive terms, and  deceptive practices.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">In theory, by requiring financial products to more clearly define  risks, fees, and penalties, consumers may be less likely to become  victims of fraud. And when fraud does occur, there will be one point of  contact for them to call. Any institution that provides consumer  financial products &mdash; from credit cards and payday loans to mortgages,  auto loans, and other consumer products &mdash; will fall under the CFPB&rsquo;s  jurisdiction.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Anticipating Threats</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Another new agency, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, is  tasked with monitoring sources of systemic risk and creating rules to be  implemented by various financial regulators to address those risks.  Chaired by the Treasury Secretary and made up of the heads of the most  significant federal financial regulators, the council will meet  quarterly and will respond to emerging threats to the stability of the  U.S. financial system.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">There will be a slew of tough new requirements for financial firms,  and regulators will have the power to step in and liquidate firms that  may be on the brink of failure, eliminating the possibility that the  financial burden would be placed on taxpayers.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Investor Protections</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Several provisions in the bill will directly affect investors.  Companies are now required to provide shareholders with a non-binding  vote on executive compensation at shareholder meetings at least once  every three years. The act also empowers the SEC to grant shareholders  the right to nominate their own directors.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">During the economic crisis in 2008, the FDIC raised the insurance cap  on savings accounts and CDs to $250,000 (per depositor, per federally  insured institution); previously the insurance limit was $100,000. The  temporary increase was set to expire after 2013, but the new law makes  the $250,000 limit permanent.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">In addition to providing the public with financial information and  assistance, the law also allows consumers to access their credit scores  for free if they receive a negative outcome when applying for a loan or a  job.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">While supporters say the sweeping legislation will promote  competition, critics believe the legislation is deeply flawed and will  impede economic growth. They argue that the new law allows too much  federal supervision of financial transactions and will do little to  prevent another financial crisis.<sup>1</sup></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
<p class="note"><span style="font-size: 14px;">1) <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, July 1, 2010</span></p>
<p class="note"><span style="font-size: 14px;">The information in this article is not intended as tax  or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding  any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal  advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived  from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented  nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or  sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by  Emerald. &copy; 2010 Emerald.</span></p>
<div class="address">
<table class="full">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="officeName"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> 		   HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services, Inc. 		</span></td>
<td align="right"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> 		     		<br />
            </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;">24240 Lyons Ave.</span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;">Santa Clarita, CA</span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;">91321   </span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br />
            </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;">Phone: 661-877-8910</span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;">Fax: 818-848-4002</span></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br />
            </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.HBWstability.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 14px;">www.HBWstability.com</span></a></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></span></td>
<td><a href="mailto:chris.lim@hbwsecurities.com"><span style="font-size: 14px;">chris.lim@hbwsecurities.com</span></a></td>
<td><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br />
            </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Securities offered through HBW Securities LLC, Member </span><a href="http://www.finra.org/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 14px;">FINRA</span></a><span style="font-size: 14px;">/</span><a href="http://www.sipc.org/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 14px;">SIPC</span></a><span style="font-size: 14px;">.  3355 Cochran St., Suite 100, Simi Valley, CA 93063, (800) 473-3856.   HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services, Inc. is a separate entity from  HBW Securities LLC.  HBW Securities LLC does not give tax or legal  advice. Chris Lim is a registered representative. Chris Lim is  registered to sell securities in the following states (CA License  #0G69788).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> <span>Although  this agency is a part of the HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services,  Inc. marketing system, it is a separate and independent agency.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/14/financial-reform-may-change-the-face-of-finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preparing for Mid-Terms</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/11/preparing-for-mid-terms/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=preparing-for-mid-terms</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/11/preparing-for-mid-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditionally, mid-term elections tend to attract fewer voters than presidential elections. It&#8217;s not clear whether 2010 will be different, but if voter enthusiasm is any guide, this year&#8217;s mid-terms could break with the past. A Gallup poll found that a majority of voters in every age group expressed at least some enthusiasm about voting in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="font-size: 18px;">Traditionally, mid-term elections tend to attract fewer voters than  presidential elections. It&rsquo;s not clear whether 2010 will be different,  but if voter enthusiasm is any guide, this year&rsquo;s mid-terms could break  with the past. A Gallup poll found that a majority of voters in every  age group expressed at least some enthusiasm about voting in November  (see chart).<sup>1</sup></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">One reason for the enthusiasm could be because there are several key  financial issues at stake this year. In some cases, your personal  finances could be affected by the election outcome.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"> <img src="http://www.chirhofinancial.com/files/newsletters/10102_chart.jpg" style="width: 300px; height: 483px; float: right;" alt="" /> </span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Tax Policy</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">A number of tax laws are set to expire after December 31. As a  result, many tax rates are slated to revert to higher levels, especially  for investors and high-income earners.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Although Congress could decide to extend the lower rates for some or  all taxpayers, the federal government is facing trillions of dollars in  mandated spending and a national debt that is growing at an  unprecedented rate. Many experts believe the only way Congress will be  able to meet these obligations is by raising taxes. Although the  election outcome will almost certainly have an effect on near-term tax  policy, it&rsquo;s probably a good idea to expect tax rates to be higher in  the future and to look for legal ways to help reduce your tax burden.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Stimulus Spending</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Although the $787 billion Recovery Act continues to pump money into  the economy, there is little agreement over the effect it has had on  economic activity and the high unemployment rate. The White House  maintains that the stimulus package is on track to save or create 3.5  million jobs by the end of 2010, but 62% of Americans and 73% of  private-sector economists believe the spending has not helped create  jobs.<sup>2&ndash;3</sup> Some officials have warned that when the stimulus  spending ends in 2011, there could be layoffs of state and local  government workers because some of the money was used to avoid layoffs  in 2009 and 2010.<sup>4</sup> The debate over the effectiveness of using borrowed money to stimulate the economy could play a pivotal role in the election.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18px;">Health-Care Reform</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The sweeping changes called for by the health-care legislation passed  in March 2010 aren&rsquo;t set to be fully implemented until 2014. Between  now and then, look for health-care reform and its effects on the economy  to be an ongoing political issue.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Regardless of your enthusiasm for participating in the upcoming  elections, it&rsquo;s important to consider how the 2010 mid-terms could  affect your finances.</span></p>
<p class="note">1) Gallup, 2010 <br />
2) Pew Research Center, April 28, 2010<br />
3) CNNMoney, April 26, 2010<br />
4) <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, February 17, 2010</p>
<p class="note">The information in this article is not intended as tax  or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding  any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal  advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived  from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented  nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or  sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by  Emerald. &copy; 2010 Emerald.</p>
<div class="address">
<table class="full">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="officeName">HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services, Inc.</td>
<td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>24240 Lyons Ave.</td>
<td><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></td>
<td>Santa Clarita, CA</td>
<td><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></td>
<td>91321</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Phone: 661-877-8910</td>
<td><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></td>
<td>Fax: 818-848-4002</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.HBWstability.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 18px;">www.<span style="font-weight: bold;">HBWstability.com</span></span></a></td>
<td><span class="bullet">&bull;</span></td>
<td><a href="mailto:chris.lim@hbwsecurities.com">chris.lim@hbwsecurities.com</a></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Securities offered through HBW Securities LLC, Member </span><a href="http://www.finra.org/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 14px;">FINRA</span></a><span style="font-size: 14px;">/</span><a href="http://www.sipc.org/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 14px;">SIPC</span></a><span style="font-size: 14px;">.  3355 Cochran St., Suite 100, Simi Valley, CA 93063, (800) 473-3856.   HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services, Inc. is a separate entity from  HBW Securities LLC.  HBW Securities LLC does not give tax or legal  advice. Chris Lim is a registered representative. Chris Lim is  registered to sell securities in the following states (CA License  #0G69788).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> <span>Although  this agency is a part of the HBW Insurance &amp; Financial Services,  Inc. marketing system, it is a separate and independent agency.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/10/11/preparing-for-mid-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>274</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pledge To America</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/23/pledge-to-america/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pledge-to-america</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/23/pledge-to-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pledge to america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans have come out with their &#8220;Pledge to America.&#8221;&#160; I will take my time and go through this document providing my thoughts to you as I go. This is important because most conservatives agree that in order to preserve our Republic and the Liberties it ensures, the most efficient option is to take control [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Republicans have come out with their &ldquo;<a href="http://www.gop.gov/resources/library/documents/solutions/a-pledge-to-america.pdf" target="_blank">Pledge to America</a>.&rdquo;&nbsp; I will take my time and go through this document providing my thoughts to you as I go.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">This is important because most conservatives agree that in order to preserve our Republic and the Liberties it ensures, the most efficient option is to take control of the heart of the Republican party &hellip; not for the sake of bolstering that political party, but rather to use it as an essential tool to protect and defend our Constitution from all enemies both foreign and domestic.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The introduction to the GOP &ldquo;Pledge to America&rdquo; is both insightful and illustrative of the problem in American politics today.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Less than one week after a speech by President Obama in which he quoted The Declaration of Independence but censored it leaving out the reference to our &ldquo;<strong>Creator</strong>&rdquo; the Republicans engage in their own censorship of that founding document.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The Pledge to America interestingly leaves out the fact that we are endowed by our Creator with &ldquo;<strong>certain</strong>&rdquo; unalienable rights; &ldquo;<strong>that among these are</strong> &hellip;&rdquo;&nbsp; Our Founders included Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness as three examples of the self-evident rights granted to us by God, not as an exhaustive list.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">More telling of our times though is what comes next &hellip; &ldquo;Whenever the <strong><em>agenda </em></strong>of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to institute a new <em><strong>governing agenda</strong></em> and set a different course.&rdquo; (GOP Pledge to America)<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><strong>Apparently the Republican Party needs a little history lesson.&nbsp; The Declaration of Independence was not a document suggesting a tweaking of the current political agenda.&nbsp; The document states; &ldquo;whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government&rdquo;</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">What the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are refusing to acknowledge is that We The People, the citizens of this great nation are fed up with the politics from both sides of the isle!<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">They have developed what is in essence a two party ruling class, unaccountable and arrogant &#8230; IF they continue to &quot;rule&quot; in a manner destructive to our liberties we will &quot;alter or abolish&quot; them and &quot;institute a new government&quot;!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Now, having been admittedly a little nit-picky, for the most part the tone and statements in the introduction are refreshing, and yes, even a bit inspiring.&nbsp; I am encouraged that the Tenth Amendment is highlighted and even by some of the iconic sound-bite statements regarding our founding and core American values.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">However, the introduction ends with their call to &ldquo;invite fellow citizens and patriots to join us in forming a new governing agenda for America.&rdquo;&nbsp; My warning to the GOP is that as a political party they must be aware of the fact that the Republican party is not America&rsquo;s saving grace &hellip; <strong>The Republican party at this point is simply a useful idiot</strong> that will either help facilitate liberty for all American citizens or will be swept under the bridge of history as another party that failed to live up to its rhetoric.</span></p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/23/pledge-to-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>299</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting Conservative?</title>
		<link>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/15/voting-conservative/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=voting-conservative</link>
		<comments>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/15/voting-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay Informed on the Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get out the vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teapartyroundtable.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Limbaugh Doctrine is: Vote for the most conservative candidate on the ticket. He rightly affirms that we are in a battle to sustain Liberty for Americans against soft tyranny, not a battle between Democrats and Republicans. Other strategists advise to vote for the most conservative candidate on the ticket &#8220;who can win.&#8221;&#160; That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">The new Limbaugh Doctrine is: Vote for the most conservative candidate on the ticket.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
He rightly affirms that we are in a battle to sustain Liberty for Americans against soft tyranny, not a battle between Democrats and Republicans.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Other strategists advise to vote for the most conservative candidate on the ticket &ldquo;who can win.&rdquo;&nbsp; That&rsquo;s just the new version of &ldquo;plug your nose and vote&rdquo; or &ldquo;vote for the lesser of two evils.&rdquo;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">If we&rsquo;ve learned anything in California it should be that this strategy fails!<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">In fact I will push Limbaugh&rsquo;s Doctrine just a bit further.&nbsp; <em><strong>Vote for the most conservative conservative candidate on the ticket regardless of party affiliation.</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Take a breath &hellip; I know some of you right now are beginning to steam up.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">First I think it&rsquo;s important to identify that the candidate must be &ldquo;conservative&rdquo; not simply &ldquo;the most conservative&rdquo; otherwise you may still be voting for the lesser of two evils.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Second, I included regardless of party affiliation because your conservative candidate might not be running with an &ldquo;R&rdquo; after their name.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px;">Our strategy must serve to accomplish our goal &hellip; vote &ldquo;for&rdquo; a candidate not &ldquo;against&rdquo; one.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teapartyroundtable.com/2010/09/15/voting-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>355</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

